Good Fences Make Good Neighbours: Ethnographic Research on the Design of the System of Herd Protection Against Wolves in the Beskydy Region
The wolf is slowly returning to Europe. The Czech Republic is no exception, after a long period without wolf presence due to its eradication, the wolf has started to repopulate the border areas of our country (e.g. Broumovsko, Beskydy, Šumava, Krušné hory) with increasing intensity in the last few decades. However, the wolf is returning to a significantly different landscape and socio-economic context than that from which it was removed in the past. Increasing rural development, the modernisation of breeding technologies and work organisation, the transformation of the subsidy system and the associated increase in bureaucratic burdens and the relative absence of danger over the last decades have all resulted in the current situation where the presence of the returning wolf is catching breeders and other stakeholders off guard and forcing them to reassess their entire approach. The return of the wolf is a very current topic and it is evident from the tense discourse between breeders and other stakeholders that the issue of coexistence with the wolf is continuously being negotiated and reshaped. Its presence generates a rich array of opinions and attitudes that reflect a number of deeper divides within Czech society, be it the clash between cultural landscape and nature, expert and local knowledge, city and countryside, or the state of czech agriculture.
Although the wolf is often seen as a singular agent of this uncertainty, it has emerged in the context of this research as more of a exposing and accelerating element that through its presence manifests the volatility and unpredictability of the local biocultural and geopolitical space, in which simplifying and rigid infrastructures clash with the complexity and specificity of local more-than-human pluralities and as such often fail. In the midst of all this, in a whirlwind of regulations, recommendations, bureaucracy, drudgery and uncertainty, farmers are trying to navigate their lives and the care of their animals. Rather than being in a mode of adaptation, which is made very difficult by the volatility of local conditions, they live and work in a mode of anticipation that opens up space for improvisation, DIY and creativity. This is evident when looking at the design of herd protection measures against wolf attack, the main focus of my research, where a series of assemblages and interactions of living/non-living and human/non-human entities emerge around fencing in the landscape, and where the clash of simplistic design, bureaucracy, environmental volatility, local knowledge and more-than-human resistance, improvisation and ingenuity takes place.
Publications
Daněk, P., Sovová, L., Jehlička, P., Vávra, J., & Lapka, M. (2022). From coping strategy to hopeful everyday practice: Changing interpretations of food self-provisioning. Sociologia Ruralis, 62, 651–671.
Drenthen, M. (2021). Coexisting with wolves in cultural landscapes: Fences as communicative devices. In B. Bovenkerk & J. Keulartz (Eds.), Animals in our midst: The challenges of co-existing with animals in the Anthropocene (pp. 425–444). Cham: Springer.
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
Gibas, P., et al. (2019). Kutilství: drobná mozaika svépomocné tvorby. Prague: Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.
Gibas, P., et al. (2020). Kutilství: od „udělej si sám“ po DIY. Prague: Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.
Holbraad, M., & Pedersen, M. (Eds.). (2013). Times of security: Ethnographies of fear, protest, and the future. London: Routledge.
Jehlička, P. (2021). Eastern Europe and the geography of knowledge production: The case of the invisible gardener. Progress in Human Geography, 45(1), 1–19.
Krause, F. (2022). Inhabiting a transforming delta: Volatility and improvisation in the Canadian Arctic. American Ethnologist, 49(1), 7–19.
Likavčan, L., Janoščík, V., & Růžička, J. (Eds.). (2017). Mysl v terénu: filosofický realismus v 21. století. Prague: Akademie výtvarných umění v Praze.
Manzini, E. (2019). Politics of the everyday. London: Bloomsbury.
Netz, R. (2012). Barbed wire: An ecology of modernity. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tsing, A., Swanson, H., Gan, E., & Bubandt, N. (Eds.). (2017). Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts and monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tsing, A. L., Mathews, A. S., & Bubandt, N. (2019). Patchy Anthropocene: Landscape structure, multispecies history, and the retooling of anthropology: An introduction to supplement 20. Current Anthropology, 60(S20), 186–197.